WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums > Applications > Quark
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007, 11:25 AM
kegwell kegwell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
OS X & Windows 2003

Hardware:
  • Windows 2000 File Server
  • Windows 2003 File Server
  • 5, OS X End Users (10.4)
Previous Scenario: 5 OS X users scan images locally on their computers and edit them with Photoshop. After the files have been edited, they are saved on the Windows 2000 server. The Macs are able to browse the Windows 2000 share, find a .qxp (Quark) file, double-click it, and the file opens fine with the program associated with it.

Current Scenario: We have installed brand new hardware and a fresh installation of Windows 2003 Standard. File and Print Services for Mac was installed and a share was created. All Macs are able to successfully connect with read/write access. After the end users are done scanning and editing the images, they save them to the Windows 2003 server in the same fashion as the old Windows 2000 server.

Problem 1: We are not able to open a Quark file on the Windows 2003 server by double-clicking the file. I have followed the steps of assinging an application to these files (i.e. get info > open with...> Aways with this app >Change all). This fixes the problem for that particular file, but all other files remain the same. There are no file extensions listed for these files on the Windows 2003 server. Although, there were none listed on the Windows 2000 server either, but it worked fine.

Problem 2: The Macs are taking a very long time to search the new Windows 2003 server. When they search for a file name, it will take several minutes, or even error out. When the Macs search the old Windows 2000 server with virtually the same file set, the results are returned in a matter of a few seconds.

Note: Everything is working fine for all x86 end users . They are not experiencing problems with scanning, accessing, storing, or retrieving the documents. I would see no problem manually re-naming each file and adding an extension to all the Quark files, but there are tens of thousdands of images and hundreds added daily, so this is out of the question.

I have seen this question asked a couple times, but the posts go unanswered. Any advice or references would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:09 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Deep in the Heart o' Tejas
Posts: 3,283
how are these Macs mounted to the server?

AFP or SMB?
__________________
David Maberry
Shift Leader
Electronic Prepress Dept.
Mac - OS X 10.4.10 Dual-Core Intel Xeon
PC - XP Pro
Esko-Graphics/Scope V3
HP 5000, Epson 9600
Kodak Approval XP
Lotem 800 Platesetters
Kodak FlexCel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:46 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Deep in the Heart o' Tejas
Posts: 3,283
found this on another forum:

http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=614


and this too:

http://www.macwindows.com/Win2003.html

hope they help,
David
__________________
David Maberry
Shift Leader
Electronic Prepress Dept.
Mac - OS X 10.4.10 Dual-Core Intel Xeon
PC - XP Pro
Esko-Graphics/Scope V3
HP 5000, Epson 9600
Kodak Approval XP
Lotem 800 Platesetters
Kodak FlexCel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2007, 10:43 AM
seratne seratne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 173
linux/freebsd and netatalk . Or if you want to go the pay route there is ExtremeZ-IP.

The built in SFM in Windows is just horrible, and I can't stand that people would actually use it, or even that MS includes it in their software. Also, there is PC MacLan, which also works better than Windows SFM, is cheaper than ExtremeZ-IP but it doesn't support afp 3.1.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PDFX1a 2003 pickle Acrobat 3 08-17-2006 04:04 PM
Help!! Can't search Nexus Mac Volume on Windows 2003 Server Dub Artwork Systems 3 08-10-2006 11:45 AM
Extreme ZIP vs. Windows 2003 w/appleshare tequillajane Mac OS X 1 02-02-2005 11:47 AM
Connecting Mac to Windows 2003 Server Bart Windows 7 01-21-2005 02:39 PM
OS9.22 to ApogeeX running on Windows 2003 server pspdfppd Agfa Systems 1 09-16-2004 03:56 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40