WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums > General > General Pressroom
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 03:32 AM
Risca Risca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Duplexing accuracy

When using a digital colour copier how accurate is your duplexing, ie. do the crop marks on the front of a sheet line up exactly with those on the back consistantly through a run, or do they vary or do they never back up accurately. What degree of tolerance is there if they don't. We are new to digital copiers and are disappointed with what we are getting.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 04:42 AM
30YearsandCounting's Avatar
30YearsandCounting 30YearsandCounting is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 99
What machine are you using and how far off is the back-up?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 05:57 AM
steve2112 steve2112 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 127
we have a ricoh 3260 and sometimes the duplexing is off by almost an 1/8. I can make some minor adjust to the otherside but even still it is never accurate but usually when I have a .25 margin things work out ok. Also things that get duplexed on our copier are not critical jobs so i can get away with it. All our other copiers never duplexed well but i find that if you print one side at a time it does duplex a little better and also thicker paper is harder to duplex.

steve
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 06:01 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Get used to it...
tolerance - about 3mm or so....
It's "hit & miss" throughout a run.
There are usually exercises you can do to bring it in nice and tight.
We keep ours close, cause we run saddlestitch work on it alot. so it's gotta be close.
1/8" would be too far out to stitch.


remember- It is NOT offset
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 11:46 AM
Risca Risca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Thanks for your replies.
We have a Canon C1 imagePress, which is a "new generation" machine, that's only just become available in Australia.
http://www.canon-europe.com/For_Work...S_C1/index.asp
The back up of the crop marks can vary by up to 3mm, but some crops could be almost spot on while others on the same sheet can be out by 2mm or more and this will vary during the print run. Also, when we fold a sheet in half for checking there is skew, is skewing inevitable?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2007, 11:57 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Risca
....Also, when we fold a sheet in half for checking there is skew, is skewing inevitable?
Yep - more or less.
From my experience with digital.... again it's not offset. :roll: :roll:
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-25-2007, 02:00 PM
Mungo Mungo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 177
We run a docucolor 8000 and backups usually depend on the stock. We have set both trays differently within the machine but still have to average it out. Light weight from tray 1 and mid to heavyweight from tray 2 but I will still have to offset each stock weight differently in the rip (up to 2mm). I also have gotten used to how far it can go out during a run and compensate for that too. We also have the problem of an A3 coming out at about 418mm width instead of 420mm. There should be more options for a "mechanical" adjustment rather than just software.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-2007, 01:40 PM
GopherBroke GopherBroke is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 3
Hi Risca

Because copiers run at a high fuser temperature you have to keep in mind that your paper will shrink on the first pass thru a fuser (i assume a loss in moisture content), I have also found that the amount of toner coverage on the paper alters that shrinkage factor as well. I try to do the least coverage first, followed by the heaviest. It appears the more toner the more shrinkage. The heat temperature varies alot during a run also.
Its just a crap shoot and you hope for the best. Sometime it works and other times ...

Gopher
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007, 01:37 AM
Risca Risca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
Thanks again everyone for your input.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2007, 10:55 AM
ATG204 ATG204 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 12
we've had a lot of troubles in the past with duplexing and skew on digital.

Something I didn't know and was told by a xerox employee, if you align your tray say for a heavyweight1 12 x 18, throwing a heavyweight2 12 x 18 through the same tray will not guarentee the same alignment. each tray needs to be aligned for that sized stock, weight and coating. very tedious but in most cases if you're out a mile this is your problem. depending what software you're using as well, i know ours allows for an image shift.

some xerox machines also have a manual skew, something that was adjusted with out my knowledge and was throwing everything out. make sure you find out if your machine has something like that, it causes a lot of headaches and saves a lot of time if you get this skew bang on.

GopherBroke is right about the shrinkage too, something that I haven't noticed drastically but I have noticed losing 1/32" image area on gloss stocks due to slipage, again its such a small amount but it does effect the overall project if someone is just trimming to crops
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40