WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums > General > Computer to Plate
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 01:09 PM
zox's Avatar
zox zox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 312
CTP Thermal plates advice

Hi guys,

I know similar topic came up more than once but I would like to refresh it.
We are considering switching our plate providers.
What would be good plates to run.

We are commercial shop, we run mostly 10 micron stochastic, we need 100 000+ impressions but nothing wild, maybe up to 150 or 200 000.
8-up size (Heidelberg's 10 col CD, SM102 (10 col perfector), SM52, 40")

We have experience with Creo and Fuji plates but we want to look into everything from scratch and take into account others, like Kodak Gold, etc..

Any input from real life experience is welcome.

Thanks in advance.
__________________
Brisque 5
Trendsetter
Kodak XP
Iris 43 Wide, Epson 9800
Linux, OSX, XP-2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 01:23 PM
pmkprog's Avatar
pmkprog pmkprog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 398
We've been real happy with Fuji plates.
Kodak Sword plates sucked, especially with the window they spec for FM!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 04:58 AM
30YearsandCounting's Avatar
30YearsandCounting 30YearsandCounting is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 99
We have experience with different Agfa and Fuji thermal plates. Not sure which Fuji you tried but my recommendation would be the Fuji LH-PJ. Been very reliable for us.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 05:01 PM
zox's Avatar
zox zox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 312
Thanks guys, LH-PJ is ours too but we are not using it much.

What is your experience with LH-PJ?

Processor maintenance, good runs, stabillity on press,..? any input is appreciated.

Thanks
__________________
Brisque 5
Trendsetter
Kodak XP
Iris 43 Wide, Epson 9800
Linux, OSX, XP-2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2007, 12:28 PM
30YearsandCounting's Avatar
30YearsandCounting 30YearsandCounting is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 99
We are a similar type of sheetfed shop with run lengths from 300 to 300,000. The LH-PJs hold up just fine for us. Sometimes get the the odd spot on a plate, but nothing serious. We do lots of hybrid screening but not 10-micron. The pressmen love them and have no complaints. Chemistry lasts up to 5,000 sq. ft. before a processor clean. It seems to run on mostly distilled water and uses very little chemistry.

If you have the LH-PJs why aren't you using them? Have you had problems or do you like the Creo plate better?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2007, 05:16 PM
zox's Avatar
zox zox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 312
Honestly don't know.

I am kind of late in the game and this was already setup.
That's why I am trying to get my head around it.
I mean, I understand if someone wants to have 2 vendors in shop, even though I dislike it, but it is beyond me that we would not use Fuji if it's better than Creo, according to everybody I talked to??

I'll have to do more research, thanks for your input.
__________________
Brisque 5
Trendsetter
Kodak XP
Iris 43 Wide, Epson 9800
Linux, OSX, XP-2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007, 07:36 AM
Dub Dub is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 124
For the ultimate in stability and run length and resolution (10 micron printing) it is hard to beat the Kodak Thermal Gold. Very hard and hi-rez and lasts forever.

The Fuji LH-PJ as others mentioned is a great plate but I would be sort of skeptical if it could hold 10 micron consistently. It is definately a great 15-25 micron no bake plate and as others have said processor uses very little chemistry but having distilled water is the key.

The Kodak Sword Excel (G33 Grain) is also a decent plate when compared to the LH-PJ but still only a solid 20 micron plate. Sword Excel w/Ultragrain is poor for resolution.. 25-30 micron min and that is with the new 980 developer and regenerator and upped replenishment rates.

Soo many choices.. soo little dots!!!

Good luck,
Dub
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007, 05:06 PM
zox's Avatar
zox zox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 312
Thanks Dub.
Kodak Gold does look attractive, however pre-bake, post-bake oven is kind of turning us off.
We'll look more.
__________________
Brisque 5
Trendsetter
Kodak XP
Iris 43 Wide, Epson 9800
Linux, OSX, XP-2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2007, 11:27 PM
bluekivi's Avatar
bluekivi bluekivi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 42
We are using Kodak Thermal Gold right now but we just finished testing on another Kodak plate. It is called P0048. I'm not sure if this is a test for Kodak as well but we were happy with the results. The bonus is that it only requires a pre-bake. We are looking to trash our post-bake unit as it goes through motors like anything (3 in the last 6 months). Good thing we're on a service contract.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2007, 07:42 PM
zox's Avatar
zox zox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 312
I know about POO48, they call it poo 48

Problem with that plate is smell.
Apparently when it bakes, some smell is coming out and people really hate it.
I even heard of some calling it poisonous.
Kodak has another plate in works to replace this one for this particular reason, I believe.

Thanks for suggestion, though.

I also heard that you can run Kodak Gold without post bake, anyone with experience there?
__________________
Brisque 5
Trendsetter
Kodak XP
Iris 43 Wide, Epson 9800
Linux, OSX, XP-2000
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thermal plates & Gretag Saphire miskozim Computer to Plate 1 08-31-2007 07:13 PM
fuji LH-PJ thermal plates j-mam Computer to Plate 8 06-15-2007 05:31 AM
Problems with Agfa P970 thermal plates 30YearsandCounting Computer to Plate 3 12-18-2006 03:45 PM
How to diffrentiate between Thermal Plates? ahmedali Computer to Plate 4 12-13-2006 06:18 AM
Creo PTP (Positive Thermal Plates) Ritchie Computer to Plate 1 05-25-2006 05:40 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40