» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Skyscraper |
|
|
 |
|

01-19-2006, 08:00 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 47
|
|
|
device profiling...
first of all excuse my ignorance on the topic of profiling...
Kodak approval is our benchmark.
Want to match all of other devices (hp, epson, xerox's) to the approval.
We have Colorblind software along with profilemaker 5.0 software
Proofed it8 target on the approval to get our benchmark.
do we then get readings off of this target and use profile when proofing same target off of other devices and adjust from there?
or do we proof target on the other devices with all color management turned off and start at that point?
HELP????
thanks in advance.
|

01-19-2006, 08:18 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Deep in the Heart o' Tejas
Posts: 3,283
|
|
|
Output your target on all the proofing devices with no profile attached (you want to see where it's at without any changes), read the target in to create the profile of the device. You now have a destination profile.
When you print to the Xerox (for example), use this in your color management setting:
Source: your approval.icc
Destination: xerox.icc
should be good to go,
David
__________________
David Maberry
Shift Leader
Electronic Prepress Dept.
Mac - OS X 10.4.10 Dual-Core Intel Xeon
PC - XP Pro
Esko-Graphics/Scope V3
HP 5000, Epson 9600
Kodak Approval XP
Lotem 800 Platesetters
Kodak FlexCel
|

01-19-2006, 08:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 47
|
|
|
just so i am on the same page.
on all devices my source profile would be the approval since that is my benchmark correct?
|

01-19-2006, 08:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 246
|
|
|
Color Mangement can be confusing. I highly recommend buying this book, it will help you tremendously.
"Real World Color Management" by Fraser, Murphy & Blunting.
|

01-19-2006, 09:21 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Deep in the Heart o' Tejas
Posts: 3,283
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackmik
just so i am on the same page.
on all devices my source profile would be the approval since that is my benchmark correct?
|
Yes, you are correct.
__________________
David Maberry
Shift Leader
Electronic Prepress Dept.
Mac - OS X 10.4.10 Dual-Core Intel Xeon
PC - XP Pro
Esko-Graphics/Scope V3
HP 5000, Epson 9600
Kodak Approval XP
Lotem 800 Platesetters
Kodak FlexCel
|

01-19-2006, 03:24 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 246
|
|
|
Have we assumed that the Approval is color matched to your presses?
This may be a faulty decision to match to a proofer. If the Approval goes "Out" of calibration, then you may be chasing your tail if things go AWOL. Perhaps the best choice might be to profile to a repeatable device and I always pick a press rather than a piece of electronics...IMO.
__________________
iMac24 (love it) w Parallels-n-XP, Indigo5000, Agfa Apogee • Mac user since 1985
|

01-20-2006, 06:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 47
|
|
|
The only thing we print are ad reprints and topsheets. 99.9% of work are ads which we ship out to publication. We take readings every morning and afternoon for our two approvals to make sure the densities and lab values are correct. If we printed everything we produced, I would agree with you, but we don't and we have never had a problem matching our proofs on press.
|

01-20-2006, 06:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 47
|
|
|
We recently installed the EFI Colorproof XF v2.6 rip.
One of our hps (designjet 800 series).
We read our benchmark approval target and generated an icc profile using monaco profiler. Then we read the same target printed from the hp (all color management turned off) generated an icc profile for that target.
The question I have is when using the EFI rip there are two areas you can choose your profiles when using color management:
Source and Simulation.
First tried: the profile for the approval as the Source and profile for the designjet as the simulation.....horrible results.
Second tried reversing the settings....not much better results.
Should either of the two settings have "none" selected?
The best results we had was manually adjusting the color through curves, but really don't want to go this route.
thanks in advance for any advice
|

01-20-2006, 06:49 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 246
|
|
|
A Color Management conversion can happen in your software when printing, your print driver or at the RIP
You setup has the color management conversion happening at the RIP. You need to make sure that no color management conversions are happening in your software when printing to your RIP or your print driver.
You could be getting multiple conversions which is screwing things up.
|

01-20-2006, 08:25 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 455
|
|
Quote:
|
This may be a faulty decision to match to a proofer. If the Approval goes "Out" of calibration, then you may be chasing your tail if things go AWOL. Perhaps the best choice might be to profile to a repeatable device and I always pick a press rather than a piece of electronics...IMO.
|
From my experience, a Kodak Approval is WAY more stable and repeatable in every regard compared to a press. Not that I think its a bad decision to use a press as your aim, I just don't a stable halftone proofer is a faulty choice for a target.
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:09 PM.