WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums > Applications > Acrobat
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 07:55 AM
rintcc rintcc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4
Pdf proofs show thick L's and I's

I know this problem has been around for a while. I noticed it using Acrobat 6, 7, and now it's even worse in CS3.

We generate pdfs as proofs prior to outputting plates. The L's and I's show up very thick on screen. If you zoom in close, then the type looks normal, and it all prints just fine. But I'm tired of trying to explain to clients to just ignore the thick L's and i's and that all will print just fine in the end. We've made pdfs in various ways, and it doesn't seem to make a difference.

Is this just a glitch in Acrobat? Is there a way to fix this? My clients are constantly asking for reassurance that all will print correctly. I'm tired of this problem and would love a solution.

I looked for prior postings of this problem, but couldn't find any. I saw one item on the Adobe site, but there was no answer there.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 08:20 AM
Eyetech's Avatar
Eyetech Eyetech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Derby, UK
Posts: 305
Does this affect one font in particular or every font? Any chance of a screen grab?
__________________
\"Oh yes I have my own artwork - I did it in...
Word, Publisher, Flash, Powerpoint, Excel...\"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2007, 08:29 AM
seetomtype's Avatar
seetomtype seetomtype is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,247
I don't know of any way around this besides asking them to zoom in a little bit
and taking a closer look. Wouldn't they do the same if they thought something
looked a bit odd on a hard copy proof? Assuming they actually looked at it, that is.

It's mostly on san serif fonts, and vertical characters (i, I, l, ets...).
__________________
MacPro Dual Quad 3.0 Ghz 4 Gb RAM OS X 10.4.10
Pent D 2.8 Ghz 2 Gb RAM Win XP
Harlequin SW v5.3 | Eskofot DPX
Fiery EX2000d | DC 2060
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2007, 04:02 PM
Ratbag Ratbag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auckland - NZ
Posts: 120
Sounds like the fonts have been converted to paths at some point, perhaps during flattening?
The result is that there is no font hinting because it's a path so acrobat cannot optimise the display of text... 'cos it's not text..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2007, 10:29 PM
frailer's Avatar
frailer frailer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 339
Happens when I send "optimised" proofs off as well. Gotta shrink'em cos our email attachment limit's a lousy 7Mb. Dunno whether it would happen if a "pre-shrunk" PDF were to be sent. Have always assumed its a screen res thing, whereby the screen render has to decide whether to go up a pixel or down a pixel. At low zoom levels it [rightly] goes up. As seetomtype says, you're pretty much locked in to asking them to zoom in for reassurance. Most people I send stuff to are using crapulous-level LCD monitors, too, which doesn't help.
__________________
Fuji Luxel V6 violet [photopolymer] CTP_30 Milliwatt. In-house prepress. Black Magic proofing.
%%flushing rest of job%%
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2007, 04:41 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Deep in the Heart o' Tejas
Posts: 3,283
We get this a lot when the type has been converted to outlines (as Ratbag stated). It's just a display issue, you have to zoom in just a smidge to get it to look correct.
And yes, I have also spent time on the phone explaining this to clients as well.
Asfar as I know, there is no fix for this.


cheers,
David
__________________
David Maberry
Shift Leader
Electronic Prepress Dept.
Mac - OS X 10.4.10 Dual-Core Intel Xeon
PC - XP Pro
Esko-Graphics/Scope V3
HP 5000, Epson 9600
Kodak Approval XP
Lotem 800 Platesetters
Kodak FlexCel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2007, 05:35 PM
prepress_peon's Avatar
prepress_peon prepress_peon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3
It's definitely a glitch with Acrobat's display that happens if you have outlined text. If you go to Peferences > Page Display, and deselect Smooth line art, that'll fix it. Of course, now your text won't display nice and smooth.

I don't have Acrobat 8, is it still an issue? Guess not enough complaints if Adobe haven't fix it yet.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2007, 09:47 PM
Ratbag Ratbag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Auckland - NZ
Posts: 120
It's not something that can be fixed, and it's not a bug. When displaying paths on a low res device, like a monitor, antialiasing is used. Text is treated differently because fonts contain data called hinting which aligns type to the pixel grid, and antialias's according to the hinting. When you convert to paths that data is stripped away and it is now a shape. The text is displayed correctly as a path, but not as text (which because of hinting is optimised for readablility). When output at highres, say 2400/2540 dpi, it doesn't really matter because there are enough dots to reproduce the path accurately. Make sense?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40