WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-11-2006, 08:05 AM
rtwdwk rtwdwk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 104
Dont take this the wrong way but.....

I have to say, I still feel responsibility should largely lie with the print shop for ensuring that the artwork I provide is going to at least reproduce acceptably on their equipment. I had to pay a compulsory "proofing charge" and to me that should include a once-over of the artwork for any obvious problems. BTW, maybe I didn't make it clear - by "digital proof" I meant a soft copy pdf - i.e. not really a proof at all! The expensive hard copy proof was something I enquired about and not something I was encouraged to take advantage of. All indications were that the artwork was fine and there was no need for a hard copy proof.


you sent in your file with a 1% background dot.
You expected your printer to question your creative.

you should be happy that your printer can reproduce a 1% dot, there are many who can not.

If you are going to take a PDF as a soft proof, get in to the habit of going to separation preview to preview the individual CMYK plates.
USe the % tool to scan your white background to make sure there are no scum dots in the background.
Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1