WhatTheyThink Acquires PrepressForums.com, Releases New Version of PrintPlanet

This site is a static archive, you are free to search, and view but no new posts or registrations are allowed.

Please visit printplanet.com for the new discussion groups

Prepress Forums  

Go Back   Prepress Forums
Googlemap ME Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Skyscraper

View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:13 AM
edgar edgar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Monterrey, Mx
Posts: 350
We prefer to receive native files from clients because we can refine their work.

Once we have preflighted, refined and prepared a job we generate PDFs for sending to the backend guys. They load that pdfs in a Trueflow worflow for normalize, impose, trap and output to a proofer. Once the client signed the proof, the backend guys approve the job in Trueflow for output to the platesetter. Native files and its pdfs are archived for future purposes.

In my case, my Trueflow interprets faster the pdfs than ps or eps.

It would have sense to work internally with pdfs. They can act as digital masters for future reprints.

As for colormanagement, we still not working as a cms hub for plating and proofing. We only use cms when proofing or when open rgb photoshop images.

You have nothing to loose working with pdfs as part of your workflow.
__________________
Dtp
Trueflow & Flatrunner
Ptr4100
Efi ColorProof
Epson SP 10000
Networking
Reply With Quote
 

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1